Depth of invasion in early oral cancers- is it an independent prognostic factor?

INTRODUCTION: Depth of invasion (DOI) has been incorporated into oral cancer staging. Increasing DOI is known to be associated with an increased propensity to neck metastasis and adverse tumor factors and hence may not be an independent prognosticator but a surrogate for a biologically aggressive tumor. METHODS: 570 patients, median follow up 79.01 months from a previously reported randomized trial (NCT00193765) designed to establish appropriate neck treatment [elective neck dissection (END) vs therapeutic neck dissection (TND)] in clinically node-negative early oral cancers were restaged (nT) according to AJCC TNM 8th edition. Overall survival (OS) was estimated for the entire cohort, END, and TND arms. Multivariate analysis performed for stratification and prognostic factors, and interaction term between revised T-stage and neck treatment, for tumours with DOI≤10mm. Presence of adverse factors was compared between nT3 (DOI>10 mm) and those with DOI≤10 mm. RESULTS: Stage migration occurred in 44.38% of patients. 5-Year OS was nT1-79%, nT2-69.4% and nT3-53.8%, (p < 0.001). In TND arm 5-year OS was nT1-81.1% versus nT2-65%,p = 0.004, while that in END arm was nT1 -76.9% versus nT2 -73.7%,p = 0.73. There was a significant interaction between T stage and neck treatment (p = 0.03). T3 tumors (>10 mm) were associated with a higher proportion of adverse factors (occult nodal metastasis, p = 0.035; LVE/PNI, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Elective neck treatment negates the prognostic impact of DOI for early oral cancers (T1/T2 DOI≤10 mm). T3 tumors with DOI>10 mm have a higher association with other adverse risk factors resulting in poorer outcomes in spite of elective neck dissection.

Organ preservation vs primary surgery in the management of T3 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective is to compare the oncologic outcomes of patients with T3 laryngeal cancers who underwent total laryngectomy or organ preservation protocol (OPP) as the initial plan of management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study on 120 patients treated for T3 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Patients with functional larynx underwent OPP and dysfunctional larynx underwent upfront laryngectomy. Median follow-up of the patients was 4.6 years. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in 3 year disease-free survival (DFS) between upfront laryngectomy and OPP (73.2 vs. 55.7%; P = 0.028) group but not in 3 year overall survival (73.2 vs. 68.7%, P = 0.8). The rate laryngeal preservation was 65% in CCRT and 44% in only radiotherapy group. At 3 years, the laryngectomy-free survival was 57.2% and the laryngo-esophageal dysfunction-free survival (LEDS) was 53.0%. CONCLUSION: T3 laryngeal cancers treated with upfront laryngectomy have an improved DFS when compared to those treated with non-surgical modalities. Primary surgery should be offered as an option for selected patients especially when CCRT is not feasible.